{"id":618,"date":"2012-07-19T07:56:41","date_gmt":"2012-07-19T07:56:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/famearchaeology.co.uk\/?p=618"},"modified":"2019-05-31T12:20:59","modified_gmt":"2019-05-31T12:20:59","slug":"presentations-from-fit-for-purpose","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/famearchaeology.co.uk\/presentations-from-fit-for-purpose\/","title":{"rendered":"Presentations from \u2018Fit for Purpose?\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"

This year\u2019s FAME Forum Fit for Purpose? <\/em>focused on the issue of skills and employability in UK archaeology. Held in association with the Archaeology Training Forum and supported by York Archaeological Trust, it brought together a wide range of practitioners to discuss what skills employers can expect of archaeology graduates, and what can be done to develop these skills once they enter the workplace.<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Speakers at this year's Forum (from left): Dominic Perring, Adrian Tindall, Andrew Marvell, Robin Turner, Peter Connelly, Anthony Sinclair, Chiz Harward<\/p><\/div>\n

Is there room for a professional archaeological curriculum in higher education in the UK? Dr Anthony Sinclair, University of Liverpool\/Archaeology Training Forum<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

UK governments have consistently argued that the country\u2019s future lies in the hands of a population of highly-qualified and well-skilled individuals whose education has been created with a focus on the needs of future industrial sectors and employers.\u00a0 This would not appear to be the case for archaeology.\u00a0 This paper will explore the reasons why the academic sector works in the way that it does, and how it is likely to change following the introduction of higher tuition fees in 2012.\u00a0 It will also set out a series of opportunities for effective future engagement between higher education and the professional archaeological sector over the next 15 years.<\/p>\n